Difference between revisions of "Format"
WiebeJansma (talk | contribs) |
LoisMarkusse (talk | contribs) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| data6 = XXX Megatons of CO2 (2020) | | data6 = XXX Megatons of CO2 (2020) | ||
| title = | | title = | ||
| label7= NCI assessment | |||
| data7 = integrity score | |||
| title = | | title = | ||
| | | label8= Total Revenue | ||
| | | data8 = USD$XXXX billion (2020) | ||
| | | label9= Stock Exchange | ||
| | | data9 = Bijv. Tokio, Amsterdam | ||
| | | label10= Key People | ||
| | | data10 = Only the executives, Supervisory board in Company Structure | ||
| | | label11= Number of Employees | ||
| | | data11 = XXX | ||
| title = | | title = | ||
| | | label12= Subsidiaries | ||
| | | data12 = {{plainlist| | ||
* dochterbedrijf 1 | * dochterbedrijf 1 | ||
* dochterbedrijf 2 | * dochterbedrijf 2 | ||
| Line 86: | Line 88: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
To what extent can the government influence company policy? (shareholder, licensing authority, client etc.) Has company received NOW support or royal status? | To what extent can the government influence company policy? (shareholder, licensing authority, client etc.) Has company received NOW support or royal status? | ||
== Paris Agreement | == Paris Agreement until Today == | ||
What has company done or refused to do since the Climate Accord of Paris? | What has company done or refused to do since the Climate Accord of Paris? | ||
Per company, where applicable refer to research on the benefits of fossil companies in the form of | Per company, where applicable refer to research on the benefits of fossil companies in the form of subsidies etc. | ||
=== Financial Results since 2015 === | === Financial Results since 2015 === | ||
This | This table is meant to indicate that the companies have plenty of money to make their company more sustainable. Clearly distinguish between Dutch data and international data. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
|XXX EUR | |XXX EUR | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Current Emissions == | == Current Emissions == | ||
| Line 218: | Line 215: | ||
== Climate Policy and Plans == | == Climate Policy and Plans == | ||
Description of the climate plans and policy of the company, with special focus on the goals for 2030 and 2050. Make sure to include the | Description of the climate plans and policy of the company, with special focus on the goals for 2030 and 2050. Make sure to include the base year for their targets. Do the goals take the entire company and all scopes into account? | ||
==== NewClimate Institute (NCI) Report ==== | |||
Reflect on NCI's rating of the company's climate plans. What is the company's rating on transparency and integrity? Why do they score this level on transparency and integrity? Which criticisms does the NCI report make? What do they do well and what are their weak points? | |||
==Scandals and controversies== | |||
Any dirt on the companies can be added here. | |||
=== Due Diligence === | === Due Diligence === | ||
Keep the broader context in mind. Is the company | Keep the broader context in mind. Is the company upright when it comes to deforestation, palm oil, biodiversity, human rights etc etc? Be critical in the sources used here. | ||
== Conclusion == | == Conclusion == | ||
Latest revision as of 14:15, 2 August 2022
| Company name | |
|---|---|
| File:Bijdrijfs Logo.svg | |
| Quick Facts | |
| Type | Public |
| sector | subsector |
| Headquarters (Benelux Organization) | Stad, Land |
| Year of Origin | jaartal |
| Emissions (All Scopes) | XXX Megatons of CO2 (2020) |
| NCI assessment | integrity score |
| Total Revenue | USD$XXXX billion (2020) |
| Stock Exchange | Bijv. Tokio, Amsterdam |
| Key People | Only the executives, Supervisory board in Company Structure |
| Number of Employees | XXX |
| Subsidiaries |
|
For this wiki, the European notation for numbers is used, so e.g. 10.000 and 5.5. Emission numbers are preferably written in megatonnes.
Company Name, stylized as Company, short description of the company. Founded in what year? Active in which business? Active in how many countries? Where is its headquarter? How many employees? Size and scope of company? Private/public? Net (balance) worth? Revenue and profit? Key player?
Company Structure
Who has influence on what? Private or public company? Why is hq in the Netherlands? Any important subsidiaries or daughter companies?
Board of Directors
| Name | Function | Remuneration x1000 EUR |
|---|---|---|
| Insert name | E.g. CEO | XXX EUR |
| Insert name | E.g. CFO | XXX EUR |
| Insert name | E.g. CPO | XXX EUR |
| Name | Function |
|---|---|
| Name | Function |
| Name | Function |
| Name | Function |
| Name | Function |
In most cases, no information on remuneration of the management board is made public.
Supervisory Board
| Name | Function | Remuneration x1000 EUR |
|---|---|---|
| Insert name | E.g. chair | XXXX EUR |
| Insert name | E.g. vice-chair | XXXX EUR |
| Insert name | E.g. vice-chair | XXXX EUR |
| Insert name | E.g. vice-chair | XXXX EUR |
| Insert name | E.g. vice-chair | XXXX EUR |
Accountant
What is the company's accountant?
Main Activities
In a few sentences, describe the core activities of the company. In a bit more detail than in the introduction.
Government
To what extent can the government influence company policy? (shareholder, licensing authority, client etc.) Has company received NOW support or royal status?
Paris Agreement until Today
What has company done or refused to do since the Climate Accord of Paris? Per company, where applicable refer to research on the benefits of fossil companies in the form of subsidies etc.
Financial Results since 2015
This table is meant to indicate that the companies have plenty of money to make their company more sustainable. Clearly distinguish between Dutch data and international data.
| Year | Revenue | Profit | Dividend |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
| 2016 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
| 2017 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
| 2018 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
| 2019 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
| 2020 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
| 2021 | XXX Billion EUR | XXX EUR | XXX EUR |
Current Emissions
Description of the emissions per scope. Critical analysis of (missing) information based on GHG protocol (probably most relevant for scope 3). Describe possible reduction trends.
| Scope 1 | Scope 2 | Scope 3 |
|---|---|---|
| XXX Megatonnes of CO2 (2020) | XXX Megatonnes of CO2 (2020) | XXX Megatonnes of CO2 (2020) |
Climate Policy and Plans
Description of the climate plans and policy of the company, with special focus on the goals for 2030 and 2050. Make sure to include the base year for their targets. Do the goals take the entire company and all scopes into account?
NewClimate Institute (NCI) Report
Reflect on NCI's rating of the company's climate plans. What is the company's rating on transparency and integrity? Why do they score this level on transparency and integrity? Which criticisms does the NCI report make? What do they do well and what are their weak points?
Scandals and controversies
Any dirt on the companies can be added here.
Due Diligence
Keep the broader context in mind. Is the company upright when it comes to deforestation, palm oil, biodiversity, human rights etc etc? Be critical in the sources used here.
Conclusion
Recap of the position and influence of the company. Are the climate plans of the company enough to be in line with goals of the Paris Agreement? Is the company doing enough? Are the company's targets realistic?